|
home
why
how
evidence
resources
contact
about
us
|
promoting abortion
The NEA outlines its position on abortion in its own Resolution
I-12 (2003), which states: "The NEA supports family planning,
including the right to reproductive freedom." And according to the
NEA's own literature, "reproductive freedom" includes the right
to have an abortion.1 This same resolution
also "urges the implementation of community-operated, school-based
family planning clinics that will provide intensive counseling by trained
personnel." But many teachers believe it is the primary responsibility
of parents, not schools, to provide counseling on such a controversial
issue.
|
Most teachers don't even believe
the NEA should hold an official position on abortion. An Ohio survey
revealed the following: only 10% of teachers believe their professional
education association should take a position in favor of reproductive
freedom; 8%, believe their association should be officially opposed
to abortion; and 82% believe that their association should take no position
on the issue.3
|
The Washington Times reports that a group of pro-life delegates at the
NEA's 2003 annual convention pleaded with the union to stop using the term
"reproductive freedom" in its resolutions because it advocates
abortions for teenage students.2
Addressing a family planning resolution, a junior high school language
arts teacher named Judy Burns said, "We'd like it if the NEA would
stick to education issues [with its yearly public policy resolutions] and
not promote abortion" by using the term "reproductive freedom."
Delegates from Ohio, California, Kentucky, and New York also asked the
NEA to remove the language, claiming NEA officials have defined the term
"reproductive freedom" to include partial-birth abortions. Even
the majority of pro-choice advocates do not advocate this extreme position.
Regardless, the delegates' request was denied.
Showcasing the diversity of religious beliefs represented by individual
NEA members, the Times also says that "more than one-fourth of the
30 [resolution hearing] speakers were pro-life delegates who pleaded with
fellow delegates to be consistent with calls for tolerance, diversity,
respect for the religious views of all people, and human rights for the
unborn."
Resolution I-12 also "urges the government to give high priority
to making available all methods of family planning to women and men unable
to take advantage of private facilities." Does this include "private
facilities" like Planned Parenthood? The NEA won't say. During resolution
hearings, David Kaiser, an elementary school guidance counselor, asked
the chairman of the NEA Resolutions Internal Editing Committee, Shirley
Cherry, to define these "private facilities." Her response: "I
am not prepared to answer that question to you at this time."4
And legally she doesn't have to. Even though NEA members are forced to
support these resolutions through mandatory union dues, the NEA isn't required
to disclose much because it's a private organization.
We do know a few things for certain. The pro-abortion National Organization
for Women has received
financial support from the union.5
And both the NEA and the American Federation of Teachers (AFL-CIO) are
listed on the Leadership
Council of the Pro-Choice Public Education Project (PEP), which "consists
of pro-choice organizations that can take the messages of PEP to each of
their constituencies."6 The council
includes about 40 other pro-abortion organizations such as Planned Parenthood,
NARAL Pro-Choice America, and the Religious Coalition for Reproductive
Choice.
1 Deceptions By The Radical Right Against The National
Education Association, NEA Human and Civil Rights, 1994, 9.
2 George Archibald, NEA Resolution Faces A Challenge, The Washington
Times, July 2, 2003.
3 Perry L. Glanzer & Travis R. Pardo, Grading The NEA, Focus
on the Family, 2000.
4 George Archibald, NEA Resolution Faces A Challenge, The Washington
Times, July 2, 2003.
5 NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, 1998 Annual Report, 19.
6 Pro Choice Public Education Project, www.protectchoice.org, 2003.
|